Wake me in October

| | Comments (2)

And I'll pay attention to the election stuff.  Because thus far, all I've discovered about politics in 2008 are the following:

  • "Smart" equals "Better than you."  Or it should, dammit.
  • The corollary to the first point is this:  "Smart" is defined as having the correct political opinions.  The correct political opinions are the ones held by the person calling him/herself smart.  Ergo, all smart people think correctly, correct thinking is smart, and anyone holding a different political opinion is therefore stupid and should die in a fire. QED.
  • The definition of "working class" differs according to the state where it's being applied, and the size of the population that can be shoehorned into the working class, particularly where vote pandering is concerned.
  • People are always shocked, shocked! That folks on their side of the aisle can act as horribly as folks on the "evil, other side," especially when the "evil" actions on their side are directed against the candidate they support. 
  • The definition of "evil" can include asking legitimate questions of a candidate you support and/or making remarks which could be construed as critical of said candidate.
  • No one wants to resort to negative campaigning, except to mention all the ways in which they COULD have campaigned negatively before rejecting the negative campaign strategy.
  • Similarly, all candidates have moved beyond race, gender and age issues, and will point that out by telling the voters how wrapped up in race, gender and age issues the other candidates are, or by subtly reminding the voters that the other candidates are of a different race, gender, or age than they are.
  • Policy discussions must avoid "getting bogged down" in things like plans or strategy or details, to avoid "confusing the voters."
  • The only people who will have to pay higher taxes are always those who "deserve it," and the definition of this class of people varies in size and income levels based upon the number of "working class voters" in the voter population being addressed.

I'm sure my list is incomplete, but my sense of self-preservation has prevented me from thinking about this any further, because I'm not in the mood to reconstitute my head post-explosion.

Categories

,

2 Comments

PersonFromPorlock said:

Yup. The Democrats treat us with compassion while the Republicans treat us with respect. We can feel loved, proud and sickened all at once.

Just in case you're thinking of a write-in vote this fall, here's a candidate:

Harry Moses Horwitz
Alcove of Love-C-233
6001 Centinela Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90045

He's dead, but that didn't stop Mel Carnahan!

Tom Author Profile Page said:

I ran for Patrol Leader of the Comanche Patrol of Troop 768, Irving TX in 1958. My campaign slogan? "Vote for me and I'll give you bubble gum!" I lost 7 to 1 - the one vote I got wasn't mine. Since then I worked as Media Coordinator for two congressional campaigns, Operations Manager of another, and Campaign Manager for a wet-dry local option election (oh - Yankees, this is an election to decide whether beverage alcohol can be sold within a precinct, town, or county). All my campaigns lost. After watching "John Adams," I'm contemplating voting the straight Monarchist ticket this fall. One man, one vote, one time.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by BAW published on April 17, 2008 10:40 AM.

Once More Into the Breach was the previous entry in this blog.

Abject Humiliation, Conference-Call Style is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.0