March 22, 2004

Blatant, Much?

Ya know, if you're a university administrator who's terrified that icky Christians might want to be a recognized group on campus, there are probably more subtle ways to deep-six their applications for recognition than by stating that:

the Christian group's requirement that its leadership be Christian was "discriminatory."

Because not only is that stupid, it also opens the door for men to demand leadership of the Women's Law Caucus or for white folks to demand equal representation in the Black Law Students Association. 'Cause, see, a requirement based on skin color or genitalia is every bit as discriminatory as one based on religion, now, isn't it?

You'd think a LAW SCHOOL would be cognizant of that fact, but I guess they've spent so much time "interpreting" fairness, they can no longer see the real thing.

Morons.

Posted by Big Arm Woman at March 22, 2004 01:04 PM
Comments

Some are a little equal-er than others, don't you know.

Posted by: Dean Esmay at March 23, 2004 08:00 AM

Oooh! Oooh! I want to be president of a sorority! So what if I'm not enrolled, 42 and male? Can't discriminate!

Dennis (the peasant) said it best: "E's repressing me!" - MPatHG

Posted by: LittleA at March 23, 2004 01:12 PM